Interesting parallels in Germany – part four

31 03 2010

Off and on in this blog, I have been focusing on a rather strange legal case in Germany. Readers of this blog might be wondering why I’m doing so: after all, isn’t this blog about Geert Wilders?

Well, the interesting thing about this case in Germany is that it shares a rather disturbing parallel with Geert Wilders’ in Holland, in that the legal process is, apparently, being used to railroad through a verdict.

This is obviously not as it should be. And as one reads more and more about this case in Germany, when tied in with the Wilders case ( and too many others ), one must wonder at the state of the European Union, that it would preside over such farces.

For more background on the Parallels in Germany series, here are parts one, two, and three. And in this instalment, I would like to present a letter from my ‘informant’ on this issue below ( who shall remain nameless for the sake of anonymity – I don’t want to make his life any more difficult ) to the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso:

Thema: FAO Mr. Barroso re: The NAZI Lisbon Treaty
Datum: 20.06.2008 16:00:18 Westeuropäische Normalzeit
Von: ********

Dear Ms. Riberio Da Silva,

Could you please pass the following letter on to Mr. Barroso

Dear Mr. Barroso,

My name is ***** you have had correspondence from me previously, the last batch of which you refused to answer, even though it contained documentary evidence, concerning a legal matter within the EU and Germany to be more specific. You are also aware that my legal status within the EU is Untermensche (Subhuman), i.e. most certainly not equal before the law, denied all right of legal representation or self representation before the court. This is a situation which you condone as being entirely acceptable within the EU by calling the court that
allowed this COMPETENT.

I note yet again, that both you and Angela Merkel amongst others appear to disregard any agreed guidelines and, the will of ordinary people, when they have decided convincingly in a
referendum. You have just said that Ireland had signed up to the Lisbon Treaty at the recent EU meeting in that city. It is true the Irish did sign up to a Treaty that in your words ‘strengthens Democracy.’ You are without doubt aware that the NAZI Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 has been ruled compatible with EU law. Therefore, as Angela Merkel resurrected your sham Treaty, she would not have done so if it was not compatible with this NAZI legislation. As a consequence the Lisbon Treaty cannot be democratic if it is compatible with NAZI law. This means that the whole Lisbon Treaty is null and void because you lied about it strengthening Democracy.

You and your co-conspirators to usurp democracy are personally responsible for the state of the European Union at present. To put it bluntly, the people are fed up with the arrogant attitude and blatant lying of certain politicians, including yourself and Angela Merkel e.g. The Berlin
Declaration 2007. Yours and Angela Merkels’ contempt for referenda, along with other governments within the EU prove that your allegiance is not towards Democracy.

The German Junta as you well know refuses referenda to its own people, on the grounds that Hitler used them. It is true that Hitler did use referenda in the early years, to bluff the German people into believing he had their interests at heart. However, he did not resort to using them, when he had achieved a total grip on power. His unbreakable hold on the German people was secured with the use of such legislation as the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935, which
as you are well aware is still used today by the German Junta headed by Merkel to make sure that no ordinary citizen has the right to legal representation, if they prove troublesome to the regime, in pursuing a fully justified case. You may also be aware that the German regime is quietly trying to
replace this law, as of July this year, with another law (The Legal Services Law). This new law will obviously have the same effect as the NAZI law it replaces but it will not be tainted with the historical date of its predecessor.

Angela Merkel is known as being personally responsible for resurrecting the dead EU Constitution and, dressing it up as the EU Treaty. As you are aware, Angela Merkel thinks that
Democracy is administered with the use of the NAZI Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935, therefore, it proves that her respect for her own people’s rights is none existent. It is, therefore, highly unlikely that she has any respect for any other citizens of the EU or further a field. I have previously informed you of the illegal use by the German courts of this NAZI legislation and, the reply I got from your empire, was that the courts in Germany are competent, even though it is blatantly obvious that NAZI style Special Courts are considered as being admissible. Your office has admitted that the verdict in my case is impossible which is obvious because I am still looking for someone who can carry out the consequences of the verdict which as you know is to walk 91kms to work carry out a 12hr day then walk home 91kms. Your office made no offer to
carry out this task to demonstrate its possibility. I understand that Untermensche could be ordered to do this because it is irrelevant if they die.

Therefore, how can a competent court come to a verdict that is impossible unless I am considered Untermensche?

I also note that you have seen fit to offer employment to Edmund Stoiber, who you describe as a devoted European. I suppose it could be possible in your eyes, to consider Adolf Hitler as being a devoted European, because he tried to unite Europe with exactly the same ideology. Stoiber will
interestingly, be looking into saving costs for business within the EU. It would obviously be a great saving to business if the employment court system across the EU could be conveniently
fixed, with the use of such legislation as the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 to make sure that employees were suitably set-up and denied the right to fair legal representation, much as I and my colleagues were, during our fully justified court action in Germany, where the German Government was the defendant on behalf of its sidekick, namely the British Ministry of Defence. The latter as you are aware, proudly admitting in writing that they had lied in court, by
contradicting the verdict of an obviously INCOMPETENT court, which had so willingly accepted their blatant lies, this was after writing in the previous paragraph that the German Labour Courts fully understand the contract of employment.

You are fully aware that Edmund Stoiber is a lawyer by profession and, therefore, has to have knowledge of the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 because he had to get a PERMIT, which is still a stipulation of this law today, if a lawyer wants to practice their profession. As you are probably aware, a citizen is not allowed to take the German Government to court and win, if the accepted law on the subject goes against the regime and, the plaintiff is aware of the justification of their case. I was told this by my employer, who had no problem with other employees taking them to court, as long as they were unaware that they had been duped into losing by their legal advisors, who were acting under the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935, or risking the withdrawal of their PERMIT which still has to be issued under this legislation. Incidentally, your ‘devoted European’ employee Herr Stoiber in late 2005 when he was leader of the CSU in Bavaria suggested that all foreigners living in Germany should swear an oath of
allegiance to the German Constitution (Basic Law).

Herr Stoiber is fully aware that the German Constitution is a subordinate document to Hitler’s Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 and is, therefore, not worth the paper it is written on. I e-mailed Herr Stoiber, immediately, upon reading this article in the Bild am Sonntag which referred to his speech. I made it clear that I had knowledge of the NAZI law and, that it would be better as this is the supreme legislation in Germany that controls people’s rights as citizens, surely, it would be more fitting to swear an oath of allegiance to the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935.

As you can imagine there was no reply from him. His brilliant idea was never mentioned again, which proves he must have been aware that some foreigners are not worth bothering with. I also explained that I was dismissed from my government employment because not only was I loyal to the Constitution, I also said it was my duty to resist its overthrow. I was not aware at the time that this clause in the Constitution does not apply if it is the German regime doing the overthrowing. To further prove the incompetence of the German legal system, you are aware that the Justice Ministry claims that this NAZI legislation now protects the client by making sure that they get the best legal advice possible, as only lawyers are allowed to carry out such work. On the other hand, the dimwit German legal profession, in the words of one employed within the
EU, claimed that the law is only controversial because it guarantees them payment from a client. This totally contradicts the Justice Ministry, because any client who was not satisfied with their representation would immediately refuse payment. The legal profession refuse to explain further,
when someone such as myself, gives them the real obvious reason for the NAZI legislation. I would also like to know why a piece of Hitler legislation that guarantees peoples rights to fair
legal advice is kept so secret from the German people?

At least ten lawyers were involved in lying in my case alone and, not one of them made it clear to me that my right to fair legal representation was guaranteed by Hitler’s Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935.

I would now like to turn to your own pathetic lamentable organisation. As you are aware there were anti-Treaty posters in the Eire referendum campaign with chimpanzees showing that the EU refuses to listen. As you well know this is correct because your sole duty is to protect member state regimes and deny rights to citizens of the EU. Answers such as “Oh we are not interested in the individual there are 400 million of you” prove that the rights of the individual are not

As for your Europe Direct line, their reply was totally unbelievable and it proves that the people who answer a citizen’s call have only one qualification, which is they have only to be cronies of their domestic regime.

The answer I got to an obvious overthrow of the Constitution was “that could never happen because the Constitution would not allow it.”

If it could never happen, then why is there a Constitution in the first place? There is no requirement for legislation to control something that could never possibly happen. I am fully aware that Merkel would love to use the EU botched version of a Constitution to have her cronies say that it is doubly impossible, because a citizen has not one but two Constitutions to protect them.

There are laws concerning murder but that does not stop people being killed unlawfully. On the next point I sent some detailed evidence on the judiciary and lawyers involved in these cases to your office. After having not received a reply I called to discover that yet again it had been passed to another department. I called this other department on the number your office had given me and you can guess, they had never received any such information. After sending the information to them and waiting sometime I called these people to ask how
things were getting on. They then duly informed me that they were the Press Office and had no idea what to do with such evidence.

As they admitted to being the Press Office I duly asked them if they could, therefore, put me in contact with some journalists, who could report on such a grave attack on Democracy. They then made the claim that they do not have any contacts with the press.

It is obvious that they only have contacts with the press when there is some EU lie that needs press coverage.

I also note that you speak of the Nice Treaty as being a worthy piece of EU legislation. The European Court of Justice was set up as a part of this treaty. This is to say the least; proof of
the garbage that comes out of the EU. As you will have read in the letter from the German Ministry of Justice, where they blatantly lie about the use of this law today, they also go on to say that this vile NAZI piece of legislation had been deemed compatible by the European Court of Justice.

Quote from Germany Ministry of Justice letter dated 28th November 2000: The compatibility of the Legal Advice Act with European legislation has been confirmed by the European Court by verdict dated 12 December 1996.

So we have a situation of the very law that made sure that there would be no challenge to the Hitler regime, consequently that the holocaust would happen and, the Second World War to boot, is agreed as being a democratic piece of legislation.

It is not possible for NAZI legislation to be compatible with democratic law so this confirms that EU law must be NAZI.

I would grateful if you could let me know the names and nationalities of the judges at the European Court who decided this NAZI law was compatible?

This compatibility of the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 only have come from judges loyal to the regime, because no one in their right mind could call a law compatible that gave Hitler total control of the legal system. The lawyers and the judiciary at the time, who were also guaranteed that they could never be taken to task for deliberately rigging a court hearing, if they remained loyal to the Führer of course were eager to accept this NAZI legislation, ditto today. It would appear that you are at least half way to rehabilitating Hitler, as you consider his legislation acceptable. Could this lead to your eventual denial of the Holocaust, after all it was only Hitler leading the world in reducing the carbon footprint, by annihilating a good percentage of the global population, accidentally of course because the experiment went wrong.
This explains why no EU legislation protects the rights of the individual, although it clearly states it should. In fact as you have made it clear you have no power over Member States regimes; even though the Amsterdam Treaty declares otherwise, therefore, there is little reason to replace all these meaningless treaties with one totally repressive bill of oppression, called the Lisbon Treaty.

Therefore, it is obvious that the Nice Treaty was the first step in the conversion of Europe to NAZISM, by setting up a court system that is totally loyal to the regimes and working to laws
compatible with NAZI legislation.

The compatibility with EU legislation of a NAZI law that originally had the following in it beggars belief:

§ 3. Not subject to this law are:
1. Legal advice and legal supervision provided by the authorities of the NSDAP (Nazi Party) and its associations, public law bodies as well as affiliated NSDAP associations within the scope of their competency.

This article is no longer in the law but it proves the reason for this NAZI law and that it was not implemented to guarantee the rights of the citizen against the Hitler regime. As you have read, it clearly states that such authorities as presumably, the GESTAPO and SS being authorities of the NSDAP (NAZI Party) as not being subject to this law.

So it is fair to presume that anyone who was dragged off to a concentration camp had only to demand to speak to, for instance Heinrich Himmler and, he would have realised his duty when confronted with this law and, immediately have ordered the release of the poor unfortunate victim.
To follow on, I also assume he would have had the SS Guards court marshalled and shot for failing to obey this law.

The mind also boggles at the Gestapo giving legal advice and possibly later, pressing charges against Hitler on behalf of a citizen who wanted to challenge his regime. So, all those people who decided to resist the Hitler regime and were picked up by the Gestapo, taken away and tortured and in many cases killed, had only to produce this piece of legislation and the Gestapo would have immediately been Saints.

Of note about the Nice Treaty is also that it set out the rules concerning QMV. This I am led to believe gave voting rights to each EU Member State according to their size of population.
This is of specific interest to the smaller Member States by population, because the biggest ones i.e. Germany, The United Kingdom and France appear to be the least democratic. They were all

involved in Germany after the end of WW II and, therefore, were obviously aware of the NAZI Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 and the fact that it was allowed to remain on statute after the end of the war.

As you can see this would leave the smaller states in the EU at the mercy of non-democratic larger regimes and end up with them being dragged into wars to export the sham democracy of the bigger states, for example Iraq & Afghanistan.

Also noteworthy is your much lauded concern for the people of Africa, which is obviously propaganda, designed for European consumption to make citizens within the EU believe you are
caring. This is not compatible with NAZI law, as you are probably aware; Hitler ordered the castration of all Africans who had ended up in Germany after being employed in various ways in the German African colonies.

Angela Merkel was recently in Israel where she expressed sorrow for the holocaust. This brings into question why she is using the very law that made sure the holocaust would happen. After all, the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 would never have materialised had the man who cut short the lives of 6 million people in concentration camps alone, never held power in Germany.

To end this e-mail I would like to make an offer to you, as you are a lawyer by profession. This is that we meet on the television and you can explain that my rights to legal representation are controlled by the NAZI Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 and you can also explain to the citizens of the EU how NAZI law is compatible with EU legislation.

I will then carry out my duty to defend the Constitution and Democracy within the EU against the NAZISM that you support.

We could then also discuss the meaning of RESIST in terms of the Constitution. As you are aware this is the minimum amount of force necessary to bring the Constitution back into authority.

If there is anything in this e-mail that you consider to be in any way insulting, I am willing to defend my position. If you do not wish to challenge these statements of facts, it proves that it must be the truth.

May I also reiterate I am in no way anti-German but I am strongly anti-NAZI, wherever they may raise their ugly heads? I hope you consider this to be a noble cause and that you are willing to take up the defence of Democracy.

Yours faithfully,

The Weekend Wilders Round-Up, March 28th 2010

28 03 2010

Alright, here we go.

Blue Collar Philosophy – Islam Rising (Video)

Boys Buzz – From The Fabulous To The Funky…..

The Toronto Sun – Cancellation of speech plays right into Coulter’s hands

Glamscene – Daily Online Alerts: Google Alert – Film | Television

De Israel Lobby – Knesset-lid noemt Britten ‘honden’

Rod Dreher – Dhimmitude at the drive-thru?

The Irish Times – Dual strategy needed of quick changes and long-term renewal plan

Pitts Report – Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders makes strong showing in local polls

Eine Kleine Nichtmusik – Glenn, Geller and Geert


Gates of Vienna – Gates of Vienna News Feed 3/24/2010

GayandRight – Good for Geert Wilders…. – Antigay Activist Prompts Dutch Pol to Pull Out of L.A. Film Premiere

Youtube – threatening Dutch values – Wilders pulls out, film premiere scrapped

Huibslog – LA Wilders Sanctification Movie Aborted: Yes, We CAN*! – and L.A., May 1st: Spencer and Geller Celebrate St. Geert Wilders, a Loony Prophet from Holland – London England UK Expels Israel Mossad, Gives Into Londonistan, Encourages Terrorism

Musings of a Durotrigan – UAF Mission Statement: a Pack of Lies

Islamic News – Netherlands: Children of immigrants are afraid to Wilders’ | Society | News | Islam and Muslims in Russia and in the world

Oklahoma Chapter of Americans United – Religious Right Filmmaker’s Anti-Gay Past Is Exposed By Americans United – Holland is scared

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Wilders backs out of US anti-Islam film premiere:


The Christian Action Network (CAN) decided to make a film about Geert Wilders after seeing him speak in public in Boca Raton, Florida. CAN President Martin Mawyer says he was impressed by the politician’s views on Islam: “We thought that churches and leaders from the religious movement needed to hear his words so we decided to take that speech, his Fitna film, and a description of Mr Wilders’ problems in the Netherlands in producing Fitna, put it altogether and produce a film called Islam Rising.”

‘Islam Rising: Geert Wilders’ Warning to the West’ was produced by PRB films and is a montage of clips from Fitna including images of hostages with guns being held to their heads and radical Muslims preaching hate at a gathering in London. It also includes news footage of the PVV leader.

The film was due to be premiered on May 1 in Los Angeles and Mr Wilders originally said he was ‘honoured’ to be invited. But he backtracked on Wednesday over comments allegedly made by Martin Mawyer, that gay people are sick, saying: “I don’t want to be personally associated with that.”

CAN says the screening won’t go ahead as planned but Martin Mawyer says the decision isn’t embarassing for the group: “We understand that in this movement to fight Jihad and radical extremism in the Muslim world, there’s going to be a variety of people with different political viewpoints. Our viewpoint on homosexuality differs from Mr Wilders’ and I can understand he has some objections to our biblical views on homosexuality.”

Read the rest here.

Ontd_political – Dutch Muslims and Wilders, revised because of LJ fuckup

Dr. Ko Ko Gyi’s Blog – Supporting blog of Bigot Neo-Nazi Human Rights Criminal Geert Wilders [ that would be us – happy to serve… ]

The Forgotten Minority – Received via Email from A Coptic Friend

The Lightning News – the keys of death and of hell

FrontPage Mag – The Silence of the Lambs

Weblog GeertWilders – Holland is scared

Hinduism Defense – NO JIHAD, NO ISLAM – Local Vote Gauges Wilders’ Popularity

Boris Braak International – A Right-Wing Swing in Political Europe

Life In Israel – Push for EU-wide minaret ban? Delegates gather

O Japan Business News 24/7 – Lifesaving dialogue past due between Islamic world and West

The Sample Gates – An Open Apology Letter to the Muslim World

Habib Siddiqui – Sex, Scandal, Modernity and Morality

Egregores – Geert Wilders Film Premiere Cancelled Over Gay Rights Dispute

Gates of Vienna – Geert Wilders Oppresses Women

The Japan Times Online – Lifesaving dialogue past due between Islamic world and West

Asian Tribune – Letter from America: Sex, Scandal, Modernity and Morality

Angus Reid Global Monitor – Most Dutch Prefer Cohen as Prime Minister – PVV definitely out of The Hague coalition

American Thinker – Democracy and Freedom

The Muslim News – Wilders Comes with message of hate

De Telegraaf – Albayrak: Wilders is onderdrukker moslimvrouw

Jacob Theodore – Geert Wilders: Muslims ‘Burning In Hell’ And All Other Moderate Views

The Fifth Column – Think-Israel January-February 2010 Issue

Dutch Political Report – Poll: Cohen and Wilders Popular Among Dutch Students

The Colossus of Rhodey – The inanity of the rest of the West

MoneyWeb – The changing social, political and economic landscape in Europe and the US

The Blogger – International Right-Wingers Gather for EU-Wide Minaret Ban

Talk To Action – Fiasco: LA Premiere of Geert Wilders Documentary Cancelled Due to Christian Action Network Link – and Dutch Treat: AU Helps Netherlands Newspaper Kick CAN Over Anti-Gay Extremism

Human Rights Service – “Churchill hadde rett” – Press Review Thursday 25 March 2010

Atlas Shrugs – Anders Gravers, Danish Leader of SIOE, Threatened with Arrest

The Globe and Mail – Ann Coulter, come back! Bring Rush Limbaugh, too!

The HomoFile – Antigay Activist Prompts Dutch Pol to Pull Out of L.A. Film Premiere

Phaedo’s Corner – Glenn Beck: Out of His Depth on This One.

Politically Incorrect – New Wilders Film Splits taz Openly

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Muslims quietly take Wilders’ abuse

Bringitup – My World, My Views – Muslim immigration and the politicians of Europe

Brennan’s – Muhaddith Quran Miracles Islamic Videos Refuting Misconceptions – make money online europe – Labour remains biggest party in polls

The Muslim News – Interview with David Cameron

Spiegel Online – International Right-Wingers Gather for EU-Wide Minaret Ban

Ihsan Alkhatib – St. Martin’s Press Mainstreams Hate of Arabs and Muslims – Hollywood: Geert Wilders Movie Aborted: Yes We CAN!

Dear England – Geert Wilders on BBC Hardtalk- A modern day Hero

Gates of Vienna – Some Fallacies On the Subject of Crime — Part 1 

Bartholomew’s Notes On Religion – Fiasco: LA Premiere of Geert Wilders Documentary Cancelled – Dutch far-right party out in cold over head scarf ban:

 Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom (PVV) has scuppered its chances of governing in the city of Almere through its insistence on a head scarf ban, a crown-appointed official said Friday.No other party in Almere would accept a blanket ban on Islamic head scarves in municipal buildings, making it impossible to form a ruling coalition, said Boele Staal, a politician appointed by Queen Beatrix to investigate options for coalition government in the city where the PVV won March 3 municipal elections.

“The PVV wants a head scarf ban regardless of any (legal) test,” said Boele’s letter to the city council of Almere, nearly a third of whose 190,000 residents are of immigrant origin.

“With this position, the PVV has denied itself any possibility to be part of the municipal executive.”

Boele said he would continue leading exploratory coalition talks in Almere, “while no longer regarding the PVV as a possible coalition party.”

Read the rest here.

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Newsline – ‘Coffee shop verdict may end Dutch soft drugs tolerance’

Refugee Resettlement Watch – Comment worth noting: the German approach to society

Frontpage Mag – Muslim Law Students’ War Against Free Speech – Dutch MP in UK to show Islam film

Ben’s Blog – Defamation of Religions UNHRC March 25 ’10

Ike Jakson’s Blog – Cycles and Circles updated for 2010

Interesting parallels in Germany, part three

25 03 2010

To continue onward with our Parallels in Germany series, I’d like to highlight a little more correspondence between Kristina Link of the German Die Linke political party, and my ‘informant’ regarding a relatively ancient German law that was, originally, put in place by the Nazis. Some earlier correspondence can be read here.

Here’s the email from Kristina Link, slightly edited to protect certain private information:

Datum: 08.05.2008 14:53:44 Westeuropäische Normalzeit
An: *******

Dear Mr. *****,

I am responsable legal consultant of DIE LINKE.

I am happy to inform you, that the former Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 was annuled.

Opinion of german left party concerning this Law was and is very critical. Especially the aim to get jewish people out of their job-practice was the main and severe criticism of DIE LINKE.

Fortunately, this law was annuled. Now, our aim is to allow altruistic legal advice by law. But german government and other political parties do not chair this ambition

Thanks for your interest.

Yours faithfully,

Kristina Link

Kristina Link
Referentin für Rechtspolitik

Fraktion DIE LINKE. im Bundestag

Platz der Republik 1

11011 Berlin

Telefon +4930/227-54580

Telefax +4930/227-56580


DIE LINKE wirkt.

Abonnieren Sie jetzt:

My Mr. ***** ‘informant’ gives an alternative view in an email to me:

Attached is an e-mail from Frau Link in which she claims the Law on Legal Advice 13th December 1935 had been annulled.

Why were they very critical about the part of the law that referred to Jews when the German Ministry of Justice had made it clear that it is no longer discriminatory?

She must know of this law because she as a lawyer had to renew her PERMIT under it to work in her profession every year.

She had to change her story on this law when I told her to read the letter from the German Ministry of Justice.

The story continues…

The Mid-Week Wilders Round-Up, March 24th 2010

25 03 2010

My apologies, dear reader, for not putting up a round-up over the weekend as promised. Things have been rather hectic on my end. However, in the interests of staying consistent ( kinda sorta ), here’s the mid-week round-up segment that I introduced last week.

The International Civil Liberties Alliance – Islam Rising Trailer: Geert Wilders’ Warning To The West 

Vlad Tepes – The Dhimmi News From the Netherlands

Free Canuckistan – Steynian 407rd

Read News – EUROPEAN UNION: Geert Wilders’ Party of Freedom called “Fascist” for Fiscal Conservatism

Honest Reporting – @ Koran, Amsterdam,Calcutta – Wilders’ PVV party ‘kept in Almere opposition’

Infidels Are Cool – A Letter To Geert Wilders

Taiwan News – Anti-Islam party pulls out of coalition talks – and Anti-Islam party pulls out of coalition talks – Ara Papian: Turkey hasn’t changed

Alternative Right – Austercized

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Wilders channels anger:

Ayaan Hirsi Ali has returned to the Netherlands with the same message as when she left: Islam needs its own period of ‘Enlightenment’. Ms Hirsi Ali is back for one week to promote her most recent book, Nomad. It’s her first substantial visit since leaving the Dutch parliament four years ago to live in the United States.
Her main point still is that Muslim integration into Dutch society can only succeed if Muslim immigrants fully embrace Dutch values and leave their own values behind. The two systems of thought cannot be combined.
“The idea that the two can be combined is why the problem has lasted so long, and become so entrenched as to be nearly intractable: people have contradictory expectations.”


Wilders good
In her criticism of Muslim integration, the former Dutch conservative VVD party MP echoes many of the ideas of Geert Wilders, once her VVD colleague and now leader of his ‘own’ Freedom Party (PVV). Mr Wilders’ party is likely to become one of the largest, if not the largest, in the country after the general election on 9 June.

He is currently on trial facing charges of inciting hatred toward Muslims. Ms Hirsi Ali disagrees. She says that on the contrary, Mr Wilders is preventing violence by allowing a segment of the population to channel their anger by voting rather than rioting. Wilders is good for the Netherlands she says.
But she also criticises the Freedom Party leader for raising false expectations.
“I have also learned that you have to translate political proposals into policy, and my critique for Geert Wilders is that his proposals have raised expectations that cannot be translated into policy.”
Ms Hirsi Ali portrays herself as more pragmatic than Mr Wilders.

Read the rest here.

Blog Smith – Muslims In UK Call For Murder Of Dutch Politician Geert Wilders On Public Street In London

IB Islamic Forum – Brilliant refutation of Geert Wilder’s FITNA

Gates of Vienna – The Dhimmi News From the Netherlands

The Freedom Defense Initiative – A Statement from Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer of the Freedom Defense Initiative

Alaska DUI Legal News & Help – Can one country buy another country?

Carol’s Blog! – Marine General Testifies Against -Don’t Ask Don’t Tell =Social Engineering in the Military-Homosexuals–

Gates of Vienna – The Multicultural Duo from Amsterdam

Dear Kitty. Some Blog – Dutch xenophobe Wilders’ local government failure

Morning Star Online – Wilders fails to form far-right Dutch coalition

London Patriot – De-Humanize, Demonize, Denigrate, Then Ban!

Politically Incorrect – Demo for Geert Wilders on April 17 in Berlin – and [ German ] Demo für Geert Wilders am 17. April in Berlin

Carry On, Regardless – Islam and World Freedom – A Dutch perspective

Cempaka Belanda – Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Wilders channels anger – Dispatch 7.3: Multicultural Sensitivity, Part 3

Progress Online – Doing the double on the BNP

The Blogmocracy – Dor Chadash hosts event about Spanish Jews at the Center for Jewish History

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Dutch PM slams Wilders as “irresponsible”:

Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende has lashed out at far-right politician Geert Wilders for insulting Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

At a recent news conference in London, PVV leader Wilders called the Turkish PM “a total freak”. In his weekly TV interview, Prime Minister Balkenende denounced Mr Wilders’ slur as “absolutely irresponsible”. “One may disagree with policies, but it is unacceptable in international diplomacy to use these sort of terms. If the Netherlands is going to operate in this style, the country will face big problems,” the PM stressed.

Mr Balkenende warned that statements such as the one made by Mr Wilders could harm employment and companies in the Netherlands.

Read the rest here. – Dutch politician: Palestinian youth losing faith in two-state solution

Egregores – Is the American Right Falling Out Of Love With Geert Wilders?

The Providence Journal – Editorial: Holland going Wilders?

WorldNetDaily – U.S. accused of aiding terror

Counter-Jihad Alliance – The Multicultural Duo from Amsterdam – Gates of Vienna – Facebook row as Middle East officials ban user ‘who insulted Islam’

Fiery Spirited Zionist – Son of hamas

Foundation for Democratic Advancement – Netherlands’ Looming Democracy Crisis

Youtube UK – Freedom go to hell

iRethinks – Freedom of Speech and Net Neutrality in (Southeast) Asia

FSN Reporters Blog – Muslim women integration debate ‘needs to move beyond the veil’

Grendel Report – FW: Freedom on fire

Muslim Activism Network – Geert Wilders ‘Unwelcome’ in Eifel Town

Presseurop – Golden age of the new populists

Grimston’s Gripes – Mad, bad, and just plain boring!

The Brussels Journal – From Meccania to Atlantis – Part 14: Freiheit 451 – Hirsi Ali: ‘Europe is sleepwalking towards its downfall’

Macleans Mag – Holland’s anti-Islamic crusader

The English Defense League – Impartial View of the EDL “Support Geert Wilders” Demo

BB News – Is France right to ban the burka in public? | Debate – Islam 101, Re: Why does America have to be the world’s policeman?, March 19, 2010

Winds of Jihad – Islamic Activities & Other Multicultural Enrichment News

Goodness World Life Blog – Islamization of the West

Islamization Watch – Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Wilders channels public anger into vote

JTA News – Jewish candidate favored for PM, Dutch poll shows

John Brown’s Public Diplomacy Press and Blog Review, Version 2.0 – March 19-20

Portland Political Buzz Examiner – Islamization of the West: “Israel is fighting for all of us.” – Labour in clear lead in latest poll

Financial Times – Lunch with the FT: Lord Pearson of Rannoch

Marc Vallee – Casuals United take a pop & rip off my pictures

Dr. Ko Ko Gyi’s Blog – Wilders jeopardizing the Dutch interests – and Preview Geert Wilders’ Koran movie made to provoke Muslim reaction

The Guardian – Is France right to ban wearing the burka in public?

Islam In Europe – Hirsi Ali: How to beat Wilders

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Is Wilders a danger to Dutch foreign interests?

Merdeka – Pipes asks “Europe or Eurabia” in The Australian

Micha & Bea: Home Sweet WWW – 5 Reasons Why I Love the Netherlands

Un:Dhimmi – Netherlands Mayor Warns of No-Go Muslim Areas in Own Town

New Right Australia/New Zealand – No Tricking, No Treating: The ‘Populist Temptation’ And Nationalist Alternative – Geert Wilders Deserves Praise for Attacking Shariah

NRC International – Christian Democrat says Balkenende must go

2009 WAIS Conference – re: Daniel Pipes, Geert Wilder and Free Speech, Revisited (John Heelan, UK)

Reaganite Republican – Chairman Zero Picks a Fight with Israel- WHY?

Real Clear World – Will Geert Wilders Move to the Center?

Roberto Scaruffi – Will Holland’s Next Prime Minister Be Jewish? [Scroll down ]

Socialist Unity – ONE SOCIETY MANY CULTURES – EARLY DAY MOTION – Srebrenica gay theory irks Dutch

Sen’s daily – The Bahais did it (again)

The Final Redoubt – Congressman Ted Poe on Geert Wilders and Freedom of Speech

Tundra Tabloids – ‘ISLAM RISING’ MOVIE ‘TRAILER…….

The Honeyball Buzz – UKIP’s proposal to cut back public spending – kill prisoners

Underdogs Bite Upwards – Dripping water on a stone. – In pictures: Live Blogging The English Defence League and UAF in Bolton

Earned Media – We Don’t CAIR Conference

Anorak News – In Pictures: Live Blogging The English Defence League and UAF In Bolton

Dead Cats & Clippings – Dead Cats: “Nancy” 03/22/10, (2)34 James Brody

Association for Women’s Rights in the Middle East – EU: Intersectionality of Freedom of Religion or Belief & Women’s Rights – Fastrack around the Globe: Islamophobic Crime Continues

Gates of Vienna – Fighting the Taliban With Pencil and Paper – and Islam Rising

Porky the Crusader – Allah is a Shit and Mohamed his Messenger !

UK Independence Party – Westminster Corner

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Wilders’ party attacking Euro Parliament from within

Intergalactic Source of Truth – An instructive milestone – Anti gay rights group makes pro-Wilders film

Lancaster Unity – BNP Organisers Come Clean Over EDL Involvement – The EDL and there friends Nick Griffin – Tommy Williams and Dave Howard.

EuropeNews – Video: Interesting Previews “Islam Rising” Geert Wilders Warning to the West …

Islamic Danger To Americans – Obama’s “Post-American” Foreign Policy

Loganswarning – Church Group, “We Don’t CAIR” to Fight Islamist Group!

British Democracy Forum – Geert is proving more useful than you might think

KitmanTV – Interesting Previews: Islam Rising

The West, Islam And Sharia – Coming to Hollywood: Geert Wilders and the Freedom Defense Initiative!

Huibslog – L.A., May 1st: Spencer and Geller Celebrate St. Geert Wilders, a Loony Prophet from Holland

Politics, Religion, and Family – MOVIE – California -Hollywood- Islam Rising: Geert Wilders’ warning to the West – and Update- Geert Wilders – Freedom of speech VS Sharia (Islamic law)

The Dutch Daily – New documentary about Geert Wilders

Winds of Jihad – Coming to Hollywood: Geert Wilders and the Freedom Defense Initiative!

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Muslim woman sues Freedom Party:

A Muslim woman from Almere is suing local Freedom Party leader Raymond de Roon for discrimination and inciting hatred.

One of the Freedom Party’s stated aims in Almere is a ban on headscarves in the council house and other publicly-funded institutions.

Ayse Bayrak-de Jager said: “I became a Muslim and I chose to wear a headscarf. My headscarf is part of my identity and I’m not taking it off. I only take my clothes off for one man and that’s my husband.”

Read the rest here.

Atlas Shrugs – A Statement from Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer of the Freedom Defense Initiative

Right Side News – New Fight: Lt. Col. Allen West Pursues a House Seat

The Canadian Press – U.S. right-wing darling rattles Ottawa free-speech chains without saying a word

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Radio Netherlands surprised by D66 leak

EuropeNews – Dear Mayor of Monschau – Group plans session on Islam council at at Trinity Baptist Church

PVV Website – Première film over Wilders 1 mei

Tambem Isto E Vaidade – Discurso de Geert Wilders à Casa dos Lordes, 5 de Março de 2010 (2) – and Discurso de Geert Wilders à Casa dos Lordes, 5 de Março de 2010

Politically Incorrect – Das Gewimmere eines Islamverharmlosers – and Monschau: Liberation Not Worth the Effort

Indymedia NL – Confrontatie rechts-nationalisten en anti-facisten

Motamid – Allen West: Unfit to Serve

Dutch Political Report – Poll: PvdA in the Lead

European-American blog – Should All Americans be Blamed for Some Idiots Among Them?

Global Social Change ( book blog ) – Once Liberal Netherlands Might Have Extreme-Rightist-Led Government? – Netherlands: Wilders ‘oppresses Muslim women’ with headscarf ban

David Icke – Geert Wilders — Dutch Rising Star is Zionist Shill

Tony Blair – “Insulting” to the USA. The language of …?

Islam in Europe – Almere: Immigrant children fear Wilders – Max Blumenthal Exposes The Real Nazis. Meet Atlas’s Thugs

Business Insider – Did Germany Just Kill The Dream Of A European Super-State?

ParaIsrael – Netherlands: Wilders ‘oppresses Muslim women’ with headscarf ban

The Telegraph – Has Germany just killed the dream of a European superstate?

NRC International – Immigrant school children fear Wilders could deport them

Blog Smith – Iran

Psycho Terrorist – Cuts Threat To ‘Lost Generation’ Of Scots

The West, Islam and Sharia – Islam Rising Trailer

Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee – HEALTH CARE PASSES, WHAT NEXT?

The Lair Of The Catholic Cavemen – One Of The Few Real Men Left On The Continent – Anne Coulter Tells Muslim Student to “take a camel”

Lucky yoU – 20 – 27 Feb : International

Atlas Shrugs – The Feeding Frenzy Begins

paraISRAEL – A Statement from Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer of the Freedom Defense Initiative

Youtube – Please Ban the quran Geert wilders ! Zaid Hamid is stupid

Scottish Socialist Youth – Report from the Netherlands: rise of the far-right Islamophobes.

Avid Editor’s Insights – Islam Rising Geert Wilders new movie

The International Civil Liberties Alliance – Geert Wilders’ Short Film ‘Islam Rising’ To Premiere In Los Angeles On 1 May 2010

NOW Mag – Ann Coulter shouts down debate

Columbia Spectator – Sympathy for the Devil’s Advocate

The New York Times – In Germany, Xenophobia Diverted by Open Doors

Frontpage Mag – Fox Turns On Wilders

Geert Wilders’ Short Film ‘Islam Rising’ To Premiere In Los Angeles On 1 May 2010

25 03 2010

Via the International Civil Liberties Alliance:

The Freedom Defense Initiative and David Horowitz Freedom Center is sponsoring the LA movie premiere of Geert Wilders’ ‘Islam Rising: Warning To The West’. The premiere will include special guests from the counter jihad community such as Geert Wilders, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, David Horowitz, and Martin Mawyer.

‘Islam Rising’ is effectively the sequel to Wilders’ ground breaking short film Fitna that exposed links between the Quranic verses and Islamic terrorism. It seemed to send the chattering classes of the left wing elite into a hysterical frenzy because it mentioned things that they wanted brushed under the carpet for their own selfish political reasons.

Read the rest here.

Update: As Phineas Fahrquar points out in the comments, this event has been cancelled. Explanations at Jihad Watch and Atlas Shrugs.

Islam Rising

23 03 2010

Via Gates of Vienna:

A new documentary about Geert Wilders and his stance against Islamization is about to be released. Our Flemish correspondent VH has translated an article from Algemeen Dagblad about the upcoming movie:

Wilders honored with leading role in American documentary

On May 1 in Los Angeles Geert Wilders will attend the premiere of a film made about him. This is what the PVV leader made public on Monday. The documentary, about one hour long, is on the advance of Islam, which is at the expense of our freedom, according to him.

The film, entitled “Islam Rising: Geert Wilders’ Warning to the West”, was created by the American production company PRB Films, in collaboration with the Christian Action Network. Wilders finds it “quite an honor “that a film has been made about him. He has already has seen some parts of it. There was nothing wrong with those parts, the politician said: “It is my message.’’

The documentary makers have interviewed Wilders, but also make use of many images of speeches he has given, as well as TV interviews.

The trailer includes references to Fitna, the anti-Koran film made by Wilders and published on the Internet in March 2008. Fitna, according to him, was meant to highlight the dangers of the Koran and Islamic ideology. Wilders announced earlier that he would make a sequel, but he will not be able to finish it before the national elections in June. In Fitna 2 he wants to show the consequences of mass immigration from Muslim countries.

Read the rest here.

Here’s a trailer for the documentary, via KitmanTV:

More from, Winds of Jihad, and Weblog GeertWilders.

Meanwhile, feel free to check out the Islam Rising website.

Also, via Atlas Shrugs: A Statement from Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer of the Freedom Defense Initiative :

A Statement from Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer of the Freedom Defense Initiative

It has come to our attention today that Martin Mawyer, who had been scheduled to appear with us at the premiere of Islam Rising in Los Angeles on May 1, has had attributed to him a series of offensive anti-gay statements made in 1997. While we don’t expect to agree on all issues with those with whom we collaborate on anti-jihad efforts, we do not wish to give the impression that we endorse, agree with, or approve of in any way the statements attributed to Mr. Mawyer. Nor do we wish to give the impression that Geert Wilders or the Freedom Defense Initiative approves of such statements.

The Freedom Defense Initiative, like Geert Wilders, stands for the human rights of people of all creeds, colors, and sexual orientations against the global jihad, which works daily to impose the discriminatory and brutal strictures of Sharia upon free people. Sharia denies basic rights to women, non-Muslims, and gays, and exalts its brutal and inhumane system as divine law. In standing for human rights in this way, we consider it of utmost importance that our message not be clouded by other agendas, as we labor to build a broad coalition of free people who hold a wide variety of perspectives on other issues, united against the slavery of Islamic law.

In order, then, to avoid creating any false impressions about our agenda and goals, or those of Geert Wilders, we have decided to cancel the event in Los Angeles on May 1.

Read it here.

Dear Mayor of Monschau

22 03 2010

By Diana West, via the Brussels Journal:

Dear Mayor Margareta Ritter(,

I have had the pleasure of visiting your exquisitely beautiful German town, the second member of my family to do so. The first was my dad, who, as a member of the 102nd Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron in Gen. Bradley’s Army, had, with time out to recuperate from wounds incurred at the Battle of St Lo, fought across nothern Europe from D-Day plus 2 until reaching Monschau by the end of 1944.

I only bring this up because I read this morning that you have declared Geert Wilders, who recently weekended in your town, “not welcome” in Monschau. “People who, just like Mr Wilders, encumber the Dutch integration debate with right-wing populism and who want to ban the Qur’an, comparing it to Mein Kampf, are not welcome in Monschau,” you are quoted as having said.

I protest. First of all, it is not “right-wing populism” with which Wilders “encumbers” the integration debate. It is with facts about sharia (Islamic law), a totalitarian and supremacist legal and religious system. He takes these facts to the public arena, a place where fears of Islamic retribution have to date silenced this essential, civilizational conversation. Another fact he brings, however discomforting to multicultists such as you appear to be, is the similarity between Mein Kampf and the Koran. You may declare Wilders — and all of his thousands of Dutch supporters — persona non grata in Monschau; that won’t make sharia or those Koran-Kampf similarities go away.   

But maybe you don’t care. Maybe you have now found a new totalitarianism to submit to. But I protest your decision to make Monschau off limits to Wilders, a defender of liberty against totalitarianism — the same liberty my dad was in and around Monschau to defend long ago against a similarly supremacist totalitarianism. I have a strong hunch he would say that, so long as you are in office, liberation wasn’t worth the effort.


Diana West, USA

Read it here.

Eeyore for Vlad Tepes, in noting this article by Diana West, also writes:

I would like to add a short preface to what Diana has to say here. Geert Wilders would have been considered a commie by many in the US during the 1960s, but his voice would not have been an unusual one. His fierce defence of homosexual rights, Jewish people’s rights and minority and mostly individual rights in general are the signs of classical liberalism and one of the main ideologies being trumped by the rebelious youth of that time.

To see him branded and demonized as ‘far right wing’ by the majority of the mass media and the totality of state run media in Europe and elsewhere, shows how far left the broadcast media has moved since then. Left and dhimmified. That views which would have been considered subversively leftist for its calls for individual rights regardless of sexual orientation or race or religious belief like Wilders would be called right wing, merely because he opposes fascist ideologies like Islam.

Eeyore for Vlad

Read it here.

Meanwhile, a friend of this blog writes:

Geert Wilders had reason to go to Monschau in Germany, which is just over the border from Belgium. It is a picturesque village, very popular with tourists. Apparently, the Mayoress of Monschau was not too happy with the visit of Mr. Wilders and she basically had him thrown out of the village.

There is the story on this if you google Geert Wilders Monschau.

This is a true example of `the kettle calling the teapot black bum.`