Support Geert Wilders in London on 5th March 2010

1 02 2010

Via the Counter-Jihad Alliance blog:

Geert Wilders has been invited to show his short film Fitna in the House of Lords on 5 March 2010.

It must be remembered that just less than a year ago the Labour Government barred him entry to the country after Nazi Ahmed threatened to bring 10 000 Muslims to besiege the Houses of Parliament. For a sitting government to censor opposing views in a democracy is a moral outrage and suggests an inclination towards tyranny and appeasement on the part of the Government. Of course the Government was subsequently forced to remove this ridiculous ban and now Geert Wilders can finally get to show his film in the House of Lords.

In Holland the latest attempt of the Dutch ruling class to keep Wilders from office has begun, Mr. Wilders is on trial in the Netherlands for telling the truth. This trial will have unparalleled significance for the future of Europe. It is not just about whether our culture will survive, but whether we are even allowed to state the fact that it is being threatened.

Mr Wilders visit will be only a couple of months prior to the expected British general election, and the issue of Islamisation is something that many in Great Britain are acutely concerned about. Hopefully, his visit will help break the taboo about discussion of sharia in Great Britain and encourage open and honest debate on the subject in the run-up to the election, no matter how unwilling the three main parties are to do so.

Show your support for Geert Wilders, Democracy and Free Speech by attending this rally on the 5th March 2010 outside the Houses of Parliament, London, England.

Support Geert Wilders in London on 5th March 2010

Link to this event in Support of Democracy, Free Speech and Human Rights.

Read it here.




3 responses

4 02 2010
Ali Mallhi

(The Holy Quran In Trial) TO,
Geert Wilders—Petitioner

According to the Islamic belief the Holy Quran is a Divine Book. It contains the words of God Almighty revealede at His last Prophet Muhammad. The verses of the Holy Quran were revealed on the happiness of particular events and its each and every vers has a connention of its own and on different and seprate background.
It is stated that that as the Holy Quran is the words of God and the Laws of God for humen-beings , no earthly power can sit upon judgment on it and no Court of Law has jurisdiction to adjudicate it.The Holy Books like the Quran, Bible, Torah, Psalm and even Geeta and Granth Sahib ete……., or their translations cannot be the subject-matters of adjudication in any Court of law. All Holy Scriptures are immune from Judicial Secrutiny.
In accordance with the Encyclopedia Britannica at page 444 and 445, the Holy Quran is a basic text. This cannot be made justiciable in any Court of Law. The challenge of the Petitioner amounts to not only an insult to the Muslim Religion as such but against all other Religions also.
The Holy Quran is the sacred scripture of religion of Islam. It is the book in the Arabic language containing about 80,000 words. It is coposed of 114 chapters (surahs) of varying size. The first chapter, entitled “The Opening” is the form of a short devotional prayer ; it is constantly so used,ceremonially and otherwise, and by copmarativists has been called “ The Lord’s Prayer of the Muslims”. It is addressed to God. The remainder of the Holy Quran is in the form of an address from God; He either speaking Himself, sometimes in the first person,or else through the imperative UL, “Say” which introduces many verses and passages and some surahs, ordering that the words that follow be proclaimed. The subject matter is varied; passages of one or several verses, or of an entire surah, deal in diverse ways with many topics. It speaks about Oneness and Omniscience and Supreme Majesty of God. The style at time fiery, is powerful, the general tone deeply moralist and theocentric; the whole reverberates with a passionate demand for obedience to the will of a transcendent but near and mightly active God.
In the faith of Muslims, and according to the theory propounded in the book itself, the Holy Quran is revealed word of God. This postulates God, and indeeded the kind of God who has something to say to us and who takes the initiative in saying it.Religion in this view is not a human searching after God; it is God who acts, is known because and insofar as, and only as, He chooses to disclose Himself.
In the Muslim view, God created the Universe; ordaining it’s processes and controlling them. He prescribed a pattern or order, which must obey. For man also, He obtained a pattern of behaviour, but unlike the rest of the Natural World, man was made conscious and free, to choose weather or not he will confirm to God’s decrees. There is for mankind a right way to live; these are the Holy Books that seek to make this know.
For Muslims, the Holy Quran is the ‘ ipsissima verba’ of God himself. It is God speaking to man not merely in 7th century, Arabia to Muhammad but from all eternity to every man through-out the world including the individual Muslim as he reads it or devoutly holds it. It is eternal breaking through into time, the unknowable disclosed, the transcendent entering history and remaining here, available to mortals to handle and to appropriate, the divine become apparent. To memorise it, as many Muslims have ceremonially done, and perhaps even to quote from it, as every muslim does daily in his formal prayers and otherwise, is to enter into some sorts of communion with ultimate reality.
As pointed out in Hallsbury 4th Ed. Vol 18 on “ Foreign Relations Law,” right of freedom of thought, conscience and religion includes freedom, alone or with or in community with others, and in public and private, to manifest religion or belief in worship, teaching, ptactice and observance. In my opinion, the action proposed will deprive a class of persons of their humen rights.
There is an other aspect of the matter. The sacred book of the Holy Quran has been in existence for a number of years with it’s different interpretations and translations. Up to now no one has choosen to challenge the same.
There is no question of forfeiture or banning of the said book on the grounds of disharmony or feelings of enmity or hatred or ill-will different religions and communities. This book is not prejudicial to the maintenance of hormony between different religions, nations and states because of the Holy Quran no bublic tranquility has been disturbed up to now and there is no reason apprehend any likehood of such disturbance in future.
Similarly, in my opinion, it may be said by that petition, the petitioner insult or attempt to insult the Religion of Islam and the religious belief of the Muslims on the Holy Book Quran.
So, I named, Ali MALLHI submit and publish this OPEN LETTER that this Hon’able Court of Amsterdam has no power trail the Holy Quran, nor jurisdiction to pronounce a Judgment on the Holy Quran, the Holy Scripture of the Muslims all over the world, each and every world of which, according to the Islamic belief, is unalterable. Court of mankind cannot sit in judgment on The Quran, The Bible, The Torah, The Pslam, The Geeta, The Granth Sahib, etc……..


7 02 2010
The Weekly Wilders Round-Up « Defend Geert Wilders

[…] From the comments – An open letter […]

13 02 2010

Ali Mallhi, while in egregious error of basic fact, is correct in that the Amsterdam court lacks global jurisdiction, being limited to the fact and law in The Netherlands alone.

International human rights covenants come to bear on this issue with great gravity. In particular, Article 20 of the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights, section 1: “Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.” and section 2: Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.”

Al-Anfal 39 & at-Taubah 29 stand in egregious violation of ICCPR 20.1 as they command warfare against pagans until only Allah is worshiped “altogether and everywhere” (Abdullah Yusuf Ali) and against Jews and Christians until they are subjugated and extorted. Those ayat are confirmed by hadith including Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387: “I am ordered to fight” and codified into Shari’ah in Reliance of the Traveller O9.8-9.

At-Taubah 123 commands Muslims to fight the disbelievers living nearby, clearly a violation of ICCPR 20.2.

Article 3 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide states: “The following acts shall be punishable… (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;” . al-Anfal 67 sanctifies genocide by saying: “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. “… (Hilali & Khan)

Surah Muhammad 4 confirms the sanctification of genocide: “So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, …”

Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390 shows us that Muhammad exemplified the crime of genocide. ” …I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. …” Sahih Muslim 41.6985 prophesies that the final genocide of the Jews is a prerequsite the Muslims’ admission to Paradise.

These facts, fatal to Islam, are cited in a petition to the World Court:
and fully documented in Islam vs Human Rights.chm

Islam’s canon of scripture, exegeses, tradition & jurisprudence is justicable because it sanctifies, mandates, incentivises and exemplifies conquest, enslavement, rape, pillage & plunder.

Geert Wilders is fully within his rights to warn his nation and the world of the existential threat posed by Islam. When we are under attack, not only military but demographic, legal & cultural, we have a perfect right to name and shame our attackers and to demand effective national defense.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: