Iran – and its colourful president Ahmadinejad – are in the news a quite lot these days…
But how many of us really know that much about how Iran became what it is today – a hard-line, fascist theocracy with a decidedly apocalyptic fetish?
With his permission, here is a little tutorial CodeSlinger gave to Xanthippa on the 20th century events through which Persia became the Iran of today (cross-posted from Xanthippa’s Chamberpot):
Now that we have all that out of the way [explanation of 'What is Cultural Marxism'], we can see what I mean when I say that the manner in which the Pahlavi Shahs went about modernizing Iran subjected the country to the destructive effects of cultural Marxism. I’m certainly not saying the Shah of Iran was a Marxist. I’m pretty sure he was nominally Muslim, though he vigorously pursued the policy of secularization begun by his father, so what they really believed is hard to say.
But I don’t think either of them deliberately set out to harm their country, though the father was clearly the shrewder and more ruthless of the two. The sense I get from reading about them is that they meant to rule well, if at all possible, but they meant to rule in any case. The social reforms they introduced were being put into practice everywhere in the modern world at the time, but nowhere had they been in place long enough to allow the tree to be known by its fruit.
The father first appears on the stage of history as Reza Khan, commander of the Persian Cossack Brigade, which he used to seize control of Persia and put and end to the Qajar dynasty in 1923, upon which he became Reza Shah and took the surname Pahlavi. Being broke, in danger of being swallowed by the Russians, and in danger of being overthrown by the Shiite Imams, Reza Shah implemented a strongly anti-communist police state and gave carte-blanche to the British.
To weaken the Shiites, he mandated European dress for men and supported the so-called Women’s Awakening, which included allowing women to work outside the home and banning the chador (!) in 1931. Another move calculated to weaken the Imams was finalizing the release of the Jews from the ghettos and repealing restrictions on their entry into the professions. Anyone in government who seriously opposed him was killed. In the process, he became one of the richest men in Persia, became loved by the city dwellers but alienated the majority of the population, who were still country folk and devout Muslims, and got into a major confrontation with the Imams.
When he felt strong enough, he turned on the British and broke their stranglehold on the country’s infrastructure. He cancelled the Anglo-Persian Oil Company’s concession, took control of the currency away from the British Imperial Bank, and nationalized the telegraph system. He encouraged trade with Germany and Italy to further weaken British and Russian influence. He also changed the name of the country from Persia to Iran, which means Land of the Aryans in Farsi. Even so, he declared neutrality when World War II broke out, and allowed neither the Axis nor the Allies to operate on Iranian soil.
Not that it helped him. In 1941, the British and the Russians, whom he had so far successfully played off against each other, joined forces and occupied Iran — ostensibly because they needed a route by which the Allies could supply war materiel to the Russians, but recouping losses was definitely part of the agenda. The first thing the British did was force Reza Shah to abdicate in favour of his son, who, they correctly assumed, would be easier to handle. So Prince Mohammad Reza Pahlavi became Shah of Iran at the age of 22.
In any case, Anglo-Persian Oil Company resumed operations under the new name of Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, and carried on until 1951, when Mohammed Mosaddeq got the Iranian parliament to vote him in as Prime Minister after engineering a coalition that nationalized the company. In response, Anglo-Iranian pulled all of its people out of Iran and the British navy blockaded the Persian Gulf, which cut off oil revenues and turned Iran into a pressure cooker.
Mosaddeq assumed emergency powers, stripped the Shah of money and authority, and broke off diplomatic relations with Britain. The Shah fled the country. All kinds of factions emerged and before long, everybody was stabbing everybody else in the back. Mosaddeq’s manoeuvrings became increasingly desperate and totalitarian, and this gave the British MI6 what they needed to convince the American CIA that Mosaddeq might get in bed with the communists in a last-ditch effort to keep himself in power. The CIA mounted Operation Ajax in cooperation with MI6.
To make a long story short, the CIA threw a lot of money around, played everyone against everyone and engineered a coupe that deposed Mosaddeq and put the Shah back on the throne in 1953. All the gory details of Operation Ajax can be found <a href=”http://web.payk.net/politics/cia-docs/” rel=”nofollow”>here</a>, if you’re interested. In the end, Anglo-Iranian became British Petroleum, took the lead of a consortium of oil companies, and resumed production. To consolidate his power, the Shah created a new secret police called SAVAK, whose agents were trained by the CIA and the Israeli Mossad (!) and beefed up the Iranian army, which was funded and equipped by the Americans. Then he proceeded with his White Revolution in 1963, which we have already touched on.
All of this, of course created the perfect set-up for the backlash that dethroned the Shah for the second and last time in 1979 and put Khomeini firmly in control of Iran. And for all the reputation that SAVAK had for brutality and torture, its replacement, called VEVAK, has a reputation for being a hundred times worse — of course, not much hard information is available outside Iran, since VEVAK operates without government supervision, but instead answers directly to the Supreme Leader, currently Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — in any case, the stories that are told are perfectly consistent with the methods known to be used by their friends and neighbours, the Taliban.
So, who are the good guys in this story? I’ll be damned if I can find any. If I had to pick anybody as the least bad, I guess it would have to be the Shah, but that isn’t saying much. Not much at all.
However, it’s interesting to note the speculations that the CIA has backed every player in this game since the 1940’s, including Khomeini–! Why would they do that? Because it gives them leverage no matter how the balance comes out. And in the present circumstances, that means leverage to manipulate the level of tension in the region to whatever level they need to set the price of oil where they want it, while justifying whatever level of military presence they deem necessary to keep control of Persian Gulf oil fields out of Russian and Chinese hands. At the same time, it breeds terrorism, which they can use as a scourge of fear to justify increasingly repressive measures against their own population, back home in America.
As Baron Harkonnen said to Muad D’ib, “there are feints within feints within feints.”